Advice

Building Trust: The One Thing Most Australian Workplaces Get Catastrophically Wrong

Related Reading:

Here's something that'll make your morning coffee taste bitter: 67% of Australian employees don't trust their immediate supervisor. Not slightly hesitant about them. Don't trust them.

After seventeen years bouncing between corporate consulting gigs and running my own training outfit, I've watched more workplace relationships implode over trust issues than I care to count. And here's the kicker – most managers think they're doing just fine in this department.

They're not.

The Trust Delusion That's Killing Australian Businesses

Walk into any office in Melbourne, Sydney, or Brisbane tomorrow and ask the managers how much their teams trust them. You'll get responses ranging from "completely" to "we have great rapport." Then ask their employees the same question privately.

The disconnect is staggering.

I remember working with a tech company in Perth where the CEO genuinely believed he had an open-door policy. "My team knows they can come to me with anything," he told me proudly. Meanwhile, his staff were so terrified of approaching him that they'd developed an elaborate system of having the office manager act as a go-between for even basic requests.

This wasn't malicious leadership. This was a classic case of trust theatre – going through the motions without understanding what actually builds trust in the workplace.

Why Traditional Trust-Building Fails Spectacularly

Most leadership training focuses on the obvious stuff. Be honest. Keep your word. Show up on time. Follow through on commitments.

All important, sure. But that's trust maintenance, not trust building.

Real trust gets built in the messy, uncomfortable moments that most managers desperately try to avoid. It's built when you admit you don't know something instead of bluffing your way through a meeting. When you acknowledge that the new system rollout was a disaster instead of spinning it as a "learning opportunity."

Here's where I went wrong early in my career: I thought competence and trust were the same thing. I focused so hard on never making mistakes that I created this impossible standard for myself and everyone around me. My team didn't trust me because they never saw me as human.

The Three Trust Killers Nobody Talks About

1. Manufactured Authenticity

You know that manager who says "let's touch base offline" and "circle back on this synergy opportunity"? The one who's clearly read too many LinkedIn leadership posts and sounds like a corporate buzzword generator?

Employees can smell fake authenticity from three cubicles away. It's actually worse than being genuinely formal and professional. At least with old-school authoritarian managers, you knew where you stood.

2. The Feedback Sandwich Obsession

Someone needs to put the feedback sandwich out of its misery. "Great work on the presentation, but maybe next time consider structuring it differently, although overall you did really well."

This wishy-washy approach makes everyone feel terrible. The employee knows they screwed up but isn't sure what to fix. The manager feels like they're being "supportive" while actually being completely useless.

Direct feedback builds trust. Sandwiches build resentment.

3. Democratic Decision-Making Theatre

"We want your input on this decision" followed by complete radio silence or a predetermined outcome is worse than just making the call yourself. If you're going to ignore their advice anyway, don't ask for it.

I've seen teams lose faith in leadership faster over fake consultation than over autocratic decision-making. At least autocrats are honest about their approach.

What Actually Works (Based on Real Results, Not HR Theory)

Start With Admitting When You're Out of Your Depth

Last month, I was working with a manufacturing client on implementing new safety protocols. The plant manager – let's call him Dave – stood up in front of 200 workers and said, "Look, I've never worked on a factory floor. I need you to tell me what's actually going to work here and what's going to get someone hurt."

The transformation was immediate. These weren't workers who typically engaged with management. But when Dave showed genuine vulnerability and acknowledged their expertise, they became partners instead of subjects.

Make Your Decision-Making Process Visible

Stop pretending your decisions come from some mysterious management realm. When Melbourne-based consulting firm Deloitte started sharing their actual decision criteria with employees, engagement scores jumped 34% in six months.

"Here's what I'm considering. Here's what's non-negotiable. Here's where I need your input." Simple transparency that most managers avoid because they think it makes them look indecisive.

Own Up to System Failures Without Making It About Individual Blame

When that new customer management system crashed for three days straight (we've all been there), resist the urge to throw IT under the bus or blame "unforeseen circumstances." Just say it: "This system isn't working. It's affecting your ability to do your job. Here's what we're doing to fix it."

The Australian Context Nobody Wants to Address

We've got this cultural thing about authority that makes trust even more complicated here. Australians generally don't love being told what to do, but we also don't love working for people who can't make decisions.

It's a narrow path between being seen as a pushover and being seen as a dictator. The sweet spot is being someone who makes clear decisions but isn't precious about being questioned.

Some of the best Australian managers I know have mastered this balance. They'll make the call, explain their reasoning, and genuinely consider pushback without taking it personally.

The Uncomfortable Truth About Trust and Performance

Here's something that might annoy the HR crowd: high-trust teams don't always have the highest employee satisfaction scores. Trust isn't about making everyone happy. It's about creating psychological safety where people can do their best work, even when that work is challenging or uncomfortable.

I've worked with teams that absolutely trusted their leader but also complained constantly about workload, deadlines, and expectations. But they stayed. They performed. They recommended the company to friends.

Contrast that with "fun" workplaces where management tries to be everyone's friend but can't make tough decisions when needed. High satisfaction scores, terrible retention, inconsistent results.

What This Actually Looks Like in Practice

Daily Trust Building:

Answer "I don't know" when you don't know
Share your reasoning for decisions, even unpopular ones
Follow up on commitments without being asked
Address problems directly instead of hoping they'll resolve themselves
Give people permission to disagree with you publicly

The stuff that seems small but isn't:

Starting meetings on time (shows you respect their time)
Not checking your phone during one-on-ones (shows they have your attention)
Remembering details from previous conversations (shows you actually listen)
Asking for specific feedback on your leadership (shows you're not above improvement)

Where Most Training Gets It Wrong

Corporate trust-building workshops focus on personality tests and team-building exercises. Myers-Briggs this, DiSC assessment that. All fun and games, but utterly irrelevant to actual workplace trust.

Trust gets built through repeated evidence that you'll do what you say and say what you mean. It's not about understanding whether someone's an introvert or an extrovert. It's about proving you're reliable when it matters.

The companies spending thousands on trust-building retreats would get better results from managers simply following through on their commitments consistently for three months.

The Long Game Nobody Wants to Play

Building real trust takes time. Like, annoyingly long amounts of time. You can destroy it in a single meeting, but rebuilding takes months of consistent behaviour.

Most managers want quick fixes. Send everyone to a communication workshop. Implement an open-door policy. Start doing team lunches.

None of that addresses the fundamental issue: do your people believe you'll support them when things get difficult?

That's not something you can workshop your way into. It requires showing up consistently, especially when it's inconvenient.

The Bottom Line

Trust isn't a soft skill. It's the foundation that makes every other business function possible. Teams that trust their leadership take reasonable risks, share bad news early, and solve problems instead of covering them up.

Teams that don't trust their leadership spend half their energy on political navigation and the other half on protective documentation.

Which kind of team do you want to manage?

The answer seems obvious, but judging by most Australian workplaces, the execution remains mysteriously elusive. Maybe it's time to stop overthinking it and start with the basics: say what you mean, do what you say, and admit when you've stuffed up.

Revolutionary? Hardly. Effective? Absolutely.

Our Favourite Resources: