Posts
Why Most Leadership Training is Complete Rubbish (And What Actually Works)
Related Articles:
The corporate training industry is worth billions. And 87% of it is absolute garbage.
I've sat through more leadership seminars than I care to remember, watching executives nod sagely at PowerPoint slides filled with meaningless buzzwords while the real problems festering in their organisations go completely unaddressed. After fifteen years consulting to businesses across Melbourne and Sydney, I can tell you with absolute certainty that most leadership training fails because it treats symptoms, not causes.
The problem isn't that people don't know they should "communicate better" or "show empathy." The problem is that traditional leadership training is designed by people who've never actually had to fire someone on a Friday afternoon, deal with a workplace harassment complaint, or explain to their team why the Christmas bonuses got cancelled because head office made another brilliant strategic decision.
The Theatre of Leadership Development
Walk into any corporate training session and you'll see the same tired formula. Some consultant with a MBA and zero real-world management experience will spend four hours teaching "active listening techniques" to people who already know how to listen. They just don't have time to implement it because they're drowning in administrative nonsense that no leadership course ever addresses.
Here's what actually happens in most organisations: Sarah from accounting gets promoted to team leader because she's good with spreadsheets. Nobody teaches her how to handle the inevitable personality conflicts, performance issues, or budget constraints that come with the role. Instead, she gets sent to a two-day course on "Emotional Intelligence" where she learns about different personality types through role-playing exercises that bear no resemblance to her actual workplace challenges.
Meanwhile, back at the office, her team is falling apart because nobody taught Sarah the fundamental truth about leadership: it's not about being liked, it's about making decisions that benefit the business and your people simultaneously. That's harder than it sounds.
What Actually Creates Good Leaders
Real leadership development happens in the trenches, not in conference rooms. The best managers I know learned their skills through experience, mentorship, and making mistakes in environments where failure was educational rather than career-ending.
Qantas, for instance, has one of the most effective leadership programs I've encountered. They don't just teach theory – they put emerging leaders in situations where they have to make real decisions with real consequences. Their cabin crew leadership pathway is brilliant because it combines technical expertise with people management in high-pressure situations. You can't fake your way through a medical emergency at 30,000 feet.
But here's the controversial bit: not everyone should be a leader. We've created this myth that career progression equals management responsibility, and it's destroying organisations from the inside out. Some of the most valuable people in any business are individual contributors who excel at their craft and have zero interest in managing others. Stop forcing square pegs into round holes.
The construction industry gets this better than most white-collar sectors. A master electrician doesn't need to become a project manager to earn respect and decent money. But in corporate Australia, we act like the only path to success runs through people management, creating armies of reluctant leaders who'd rather be doing the work they're actually good at.
The Real Skills Nobody Teaches
After watching hundreds of managers struggle with the same issues repeatedly, I've identified the core skills that actually matter in leadership roles. None of these appear in traditional training curricula:
Decision-making under incomplete information. Most business decisions can't wait for perfect data. Good leaders learn to make the best choice available with the information they have, then adjust course as needed. This is a skill you develop through practice, not PowerPoint presentations.
Having difficult conversations without destroying relationships. Every manager will eventually need to address performance issues, deliver bad news, or resolve conflicts between team members. The ability to be direct while remaining respectful is crucial, yet most leadership training focuses on being "positive" and "supportive" without acknowledging that sometimes you need to tell people things they don't want to hear.
This is where dealing with hostility training becomes invaluable – something I wish more organisations invested in properly.
Resource allocation in constrained environments. Leadership isn't about having unlimited budgets and infinite time. It's about making tough choices when you can't give everyone what they want. The best managers I know are masters at prioritisation and saying no to good ideas in favour of great ones.
The Authenticity Problem
Here's something that will ruffle feathers: the current obsession with "authentic leadership" is creating more problems than it solves. I've watched managers use "authenticity" as an excuse for poor behaviour, emotional outbursts, and inconsistent decision-making.
Being authentic doesn't mean sharing every feeling or opinion with your team. Professional authenticity means being genuine within appropriate boundaries. Your staff don't need to know you're going through a divorce or that you think the new strategy is doomed to fail. They need you to be reliable, fair, and focused on their success.
The most effective leaders I know have learned to separate their personal authenticity from their professional persona. They're not fake – they're contextually appropriate. There's a massive difference.
Why Technical Expertise Still Matters
Another unpopular opinion: the best leaders usually have deep technical knowledge in their field. This Silicon Valley myth that you can manage anything if you're good at "leadership" has created a generation of executives who make decisions without understanding the practical implications.
You can't effectively lead a software development team if you don't understand code. You can't manage a sales team if you've never closed a deal. General management skills are important, but they're not sufficient.
Wesfarmers succeeds because their leaders typically come from within their industries. The person running Bunnings understands retail and construction. The Coles leadership team knows grocery retail inside and out. They're not generic managers parachuted in from consulting firms – they're industry experts who've developed leadership skills on top of domain expertise.
The Small Business Reality
Most leadership training is designed for large corporations with dedicated HR departments and training budgets. But 97% of Australian businesses employ fewer than 20 people. These organisations face completely different challenges and need practical, immediately applicable solutions.
Small business leaders wear multiple hats. They're doing the books, handling customer complaints, managing staff, and trying to grow the business simultaneously. They don't need theories about change management – they need specific techniques for motivating a team of five people when cash flow is tight and everyone's working overtime.
The best small business leaders I know are pragmatists who've learned to adapt quickly, communicate clearly, and make decisions fast. They've developed these skills through necessity, not formal training programs.
What Works Instead
Based on fifteen years of watching leaders succeed and fail, here's what actually develops effective managers:
Mentorship programs that pair emerging leaders with experienced ones. Not generic coaching, but specific guidance from someone who's faced similar challenges in similar contexts. The mentor needs to have actual war stories, not just theoretical frameworks.
Project-based learning where people lead real initiatives with measurable outcomes. Give someone responsibility for improving customer satisfaction scores or reducing workplace accidents. Real problems with real consequences teach leadership faster than any simulation.
Cross-functional exposure so leaders understand how different parts of the business work together. Spend time in operations, finance, sales, and customer service. You can't lead effectively if you don't understand the broader context of your decisions.
Regular feedback loops with direct reports, peers, and supervisors. Not annual performance reviews, but ongoing conversations about what's working and what isn't. Most managers operate in information vacuums and make the same mistakes repeatedly because nobody tells them what they're doing wrong.
The Future of Leadership Development
The organisations that get leadership development right treat it as an ongoing process, not an event. They create cultures where learning from mistakes is encouraged, where asking for help is seen as strength rather than weakness, and where leadership skills are developed through practice rather than theory.
They also recognise that different situations require different leadership approaches. The skills needed to lead a crisis response team are different from those required to manage long-term strategic planning. Effective leaders are contextual – they adapt their style based on circumstances, team needs, and business requirements.
Stop Wasting Money on Generic Solutions
Every week, I see organisations spending thousands on leadership training that won't change anything. They're addressing surface-level symptoms while ignoring fundamental structural issues that prevent good leadership from emerging.
Before investing in another leadership program, ask yourself: What specific leadership challenges are we trying to solve? Who in our organisation already demonstrates effective leadership, and how did they develop those skills? What barriers prevent our managers from being more effective?
The answers might surprise you. Often, the problem isn't lack of leadership training – it's systems, processes, and cultures that punish good leadership and reward the wrong behaviours.
Real leadership development happens when organisations create environments where people can learn, practice, make mistakes, and grow. Everything else is just expensive theatre that makes executives feel good about "investing in people" while changing absolutely nothing.
The sooner we acknowledge this reality, the sooner we can start developing leaders who can actually handle the challenges modern businesses face. Until then, we'll keep producing managers who know all the right buzzwords but can't solve real problems when they arise.
And trust me, real problems always arise.